 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Andrew Scott Thompson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com</link>
	<description>The 21st Century can't handle Babies in Space</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My life&#8217;s greatest achievement by James McOmber</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=253&cpage=1#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>James McOmber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=253#comment-1882</guid>
		<description>If I were the editor of a well-respected periodical and I found this first, I'd say, "hell with the resume and let's hire this guy NOW."

(I laugh harder every time I listen to it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were the editor of a well-respected periodical and I found this first, I&#8217;d say, &#8220;hell with the resume and let&#8217;s hire this guy NOW.&#8221;</p>
<p>(I laugh harder every time I listen to it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summer Solstice at the Kimmel Center by James McOmber</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=222&cpage=1#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>James McOmber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=222#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>1. So the person in the pink jumpsuit is a dude in drag?  I have to admit my initial attraction to the backside.

2. Huzzah for high school ska-obsession memories.  Last year I saw the premier of this: http://www.theupbeatmovie.com/ (made by a guy in SLC) and some local third-wave band played before the screening.  It was weird to watch the skapunk-turned-emo kids and a few dedicated checkered goofballs doing the '90s whiteboy skank -- and especially weird to think I was one of those checkered goofball kids not that long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. So the person in the pink jumpsuit is a dude in drag?  I have to admit my initial attraction to the backside.</p>
<p>2. Huzzah for high school ska-obsession memories.  Last year I saw the premier of this: <a href="http://www.theupbeatmovie.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theupbeatmovie.com/</a> (made by a guy in SLC) and some local third-wave band played before the screening.  It was weird to watch the skapunk-turned-emo kids and a few dedicated checkered goofballs doing the &#8217;90s whiteboy skank &#8212; and especially weird to think I was one of those checkered goofball kids not that long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gentrifuckers by James McOmber</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=199&cpage=1#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>James McOmber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=199#comment-985</guid>
		<description>I'm not surprised that people are pissed about yups making everything into hip, white-friendly, "go-green" establishments.  It's comical that they didn't do the homework and the place had been around for a while, and I'd be fuming if I were Dennis, but watching gentrification in action while long-standing local fare sinks into oblivion is probably maddening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that people are pissed about yups making everything into hip, white-friendly, &#8220;go-green&#8221; establishments.  It&#8217;s comical that they didn&#8217;t do the homework and the place had been around for a while, and I&#8217;d be fuming if I were Dennis, but watching gentrification in action while long-standing local fare sinks into oblivion is probably maddening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sick Like Me by Evi Numen</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=174&cpage=1#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Evi Numen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=174#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I figured I should post this here as well for Mr. Thompson's readers:

I have several points I'd like to make in response to Andrew Thompson's article on his experience as a sitter for my thesis work [Arts, "Sick Like Me," May 14, 2009]. Andrew responded to a Craigslist ad I posted asking for volunteers for my series of portraits on people with mental health conditions and providing a link to a gallery of examples of such portraits (evinumen.com/section/67902.html). After having seen my work including the series of portraits in question, Thompson sent me an e-mail saying, "I wouldn't mind being photographed for your project." One might wonder why he approached me to be included in my project if he didn't like my previous work, and didn't agree with how the portraits were done.

Furthermore, if he didn't agree with how the actual photo shoot took place, he wasn't obliged to sign the model release form. Even after having signed it, if he found himself feeling uncomfortable with a stark depiction, he could have made a request and I would gladly have removed his image from my project and the exhibition. Instead, when I asked him if he wanted to be included in the thesis show, if it would help the article he was writing about me, he requested that I include his portrait. Suffice it to say, I feel manipulated, as it is clear to me now that his motives had more to do with fabricating an angle for a story than helping an artist with her project.

Despite what Thompson writes, I don't have a single image of him smiling. In fact, I remarked upon the fact that in the 36 frames I have of his portrait, his expression remained disturbingly unchanged. My posing instructions ("relax your face") were geared toward getting a different expression from him, rather than making him look sick or weak. That said, this particular series of portraits is not meant to be flattering or resemble smiling yearbook images, but to depict the turmoil that all of us experience in the face of adversity. Thompson fails to mention that I have included my self-portrait in this project, putting myself in the same position as my other sitters.

Moreover, I was rather shocked by the fact that Thompson wrote his article without ever having seen the work in person. Printed 30 by 40 inches and hung higher than eye level, the portraits loom over the viewer, reversing the power relations that usually exist between the depicted and the beholder. I would be hard-pressed to find anyone looking "helplessly weak" in this presentation. On the contrary, the sitters look self-sufficient, confident yet honest, and perhaps vulnerably human. I'm not a therapist by any means, but I would suggest that the article is hardly about the work and more about Thompson's own self-image as a mental health sufferer. Thompson, like all the other sitters, agreed to be part of this project knowing full well what it entailed, and he should take responsibility for his own actions.

Finally, it is regrettable that the PennDesign MFA Thesis Show was misrepresented in this way. I wish that a proper review might be written by someone who has actually visited the show, to be fair to both myself and the other artists participating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured I should post this here as well for Mr. Thompson&#8217;s readers:</p>
<p>I have several points I&#8217;d like to make in response to Andrew Thompson&#8217;s article on his experience as a sitter for my thesis work [Arts, "Sick Like Me," May 14, 2009]. Andrew responded to a Craigslist ad I posted asking for volunteers for my series of portraits on people with mental health conditions and providing a link to a gallery of examples of such portraits (evinumen.com/section/67902.html). After having seen my work including the series of portraits in question, Thompson sent me an e-mail saying, &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t mind being photographed for your project.&#8221; One might wonder why he approached me to be included in my project if he didn&#8217;t like my previous work, and didn&#8217;t agree with how the portraits were done.</p>
<p>Furthermore, if he didn&#8217;t agree with how the actual photo shoot took place, he wasn&#8217;t obliged to sign the model release form. Even after having signed it, if he found himself feeling uncomfortable with a stark depiction, he could have made a request and I would gladly have removed his image from my project and the exhibition. Instead, when I asked him if he wanted to be included in the thesis show, if it would help the article he was writing about me, he requested that I include his portrait. Suffice it to say, I feel manipulated, as it is clear to me now that his motives had more to do with fabricating an angle for a story than helping an artist with her project.</p>
<p>Despite what Thompson writes, I don&#8217;t have a single image of him smiling. In fact, I remarked upon the fact that in the 36 frames I have of his portrait, his expression remained disturbingly unchanged. My posing instructions (&#8221;relax your face&#8221;) were geared toward getting a different expression from him, rather than making him look sick or weak. That said, this particular series of portraits is not meant to be flattering or resemble smiling yearbook images, but to depict the turmoil that all of us experience in the face of adversity. Thompson fails to mention that I have included my self-portrait in this project, putting myself in the same position as my other sitters.</p>
<p>Moreover, I was rather shocked by the fact that Thompson wrote his article without ever having seen the work in person. Printed 30 by 40 inches and hung higher than eye level, the portraits loom over the viewer, reversing the power relations that usually exist between the depicted and the beholder. I would be hard-pressed to find anyone looking &#8220;helplessly weak&#8221; in this presentation. On the contrary, the sitters look self-sufficient, confident yet honest, and perhaps vulnerably human. I&#8217;m not a therapist by any means, but I would suggest that the article is hardly about the work and more about Thompson&#8217;s own self-image as a mental health sufferer. Thompson, like all the other sitters, agreed to be part of this project knowing full well what it entailed, and he should take responsibility for his own actions.</p>
<p>Finally, it is regrettable that the PennDesign MFA Thesis Show was misrepresented in this way. I wish that a proper review might be written by someone who has actually visited the show, to be fair to both myself and the other artists participating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metronomics: Trouble with your budget? Try coming out of the closet by James McOmber</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=137&cpage=1#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>James McOmber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=137#comment-247</guid>
		<description>&#62;fewer domestic balls-and-chains

domestic balls lawl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;fewer domestic balls-and-chains</p>
<p>domestic balls lawl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Palo Alto by Aaron Stella</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=79&cpage=1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=79#comment-42</guid>
		<description>You have a distaste for Palo Alto, that's for certain, but you never let any invective slip, nor articulate what exactly irks you about the place. In many of its facets, Palo Alto sounds very much like every other sector in the wasteland of suburban blight; the only difference, being, that people adorn there homes in statues of religions of the east. There are many towns like Palo Alto here on the west coast, sans the orientaphila of course. That's not to say your exposition is old hat--not in the slightest. In fact, it is quite refreshing: I find it always a nuanced pleasure to read testimonies/accounts/reflections/ or what not of people's opinions of their various homesteads, particularly when it is of the caliber such that you described.  But I have to say, the obsessive evaluative habits Palo Altans engage remarkably reflect that of Agrestic, the neighborhood in Weeds. That neighborhood is very suburban west coast. So, my question is, did you enjoy your stay, or did the thralldom of the citizenry irk you to the point of displeasure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a distaste for Palo Alto, that&#8217;s for certain, but you never let any invective slip, nor articulate what exactly irks you about the place. In many of its facets, Palo Alto sounds very much like every other sector in the wasteland of suburban blight; the only difference, being, that people adorn there homes in statues of religions of the east. There are many towns like Palo Alto here on the west coast, sans the orientaphila of course. That&#8217;s not to say your exposition is old hat&#8211;not in the slightest. In fact, it is quite refreshing: I find it always a nuanced pleasure to read testimonies/accounts/reflections/ or what not of people&#8217;s opinions of their various homesteads, particularly when it is of the caliber such that you described.  But I have to say, the obsessive evaluative habits Palo Altans engage remarkably reflect that of Agrestic, the neighborhood in Weeds. That neighborhood is very suburban west coast. So, my question is, did you enjoy your stay, or did the thralldom of the citizenry irk you to the point of displeasure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Burning Love by arvcondor</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=72&cpage=1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>arvcondor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://babiesinspace.wordpress.com/?p=176#comment-36</guid>
		<description>You've got me pegged, Wink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got me pegged, Wink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Burning Love by Christopher Wink</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=72&cpage=1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Wink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://babiesinspace.wordpress.com/?p=176#comment-35</guid>
		<description>glad you got the experience, but i woulda expected you to jump those cops, with your tinge of anti-authority hipster.

plus, septa ain't never close down. grab yourself a bus, son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glad you got the experience, but i woulda expected you to jump those cops, with your tinge of anti-authority hipster.</p>
<p>plus, septa ain&#8217;t never close down. grab yourself a bus, son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on  by eva peron</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=69&cpage=1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>eva peron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://babiesinspace.wordpress.com/?p=164#comment-34</guid>
		<description>That is creepy as hell. Much more dangerous than babies in space. (that, by the way, is a fantastic story -- your dad is hilarious).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is creepy as hell. Much more dangerous than babies in space. (that, by the way, is a fantastic story &#8212; your dad is hilarious).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rise Up With Fists by James</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewsthompson.com/?p=68&cpage=1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://babiesinspace.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Well-written, my friend.  You should have asked him, "On a scale of 1 to 10, how punk rawk would you rate yourself?"  I have such fond memories of going around and asking that question to people like Bobby Burns.  The most hardcore ones always said, "Uh, negative 1."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well-written, my friend.  You should have asked him, &#8220;On a scale of 1 to 10, how punk rawk would you rate yourself?&#8221;  I have such fond memories of going around and asking that question to people like Bobby Burns.  The most hardcore ones always said, &#8220;Uh, negative 1.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
